Why can’t our political leaders work together as threats loom and problems mount? Why do people so readily assume the worst about the motives of their fellow citizens? In The Righteous Mind, social psychologist Jonathan Haidt explores the origins of our divisions and points the way forward to mutual understanding.
His starting point is moral intuition—the nearly instantaneous perceptions we all have about other people and the things they do. These intuitions feel like self-evident truths, making us righteously certain that those who see things differently are wrong. Haidt shows us how these intuitions differ across cultures, including the cultures of the political left and right. He blends his own research findings with those of anthropologists, historians, and other psychologists to draw a map of the moral domain, and he explains why conservatives can navigate that map more skillfully than can liberals. He then examines the origins of morality, overturning the view that evolution made us fundamentally selfish creatures. But rather than arguing that we are innately altruistic, he makes a more subtle claim—that we are fundamentally groupish. It is our groupishness, he explains, that leads to our greatest joys, our religious divisions, and our political affiliations. In a stunning final chapter on ideology and civility, Haidt shows what each side is right about, and why we need the insights of liberals, conservatives, and libertarians to flourish as a nation.
Johathan Haidt is the Thomas Cooley Professor of Ethical Leadership at New York University's Stern School of Business. He is the author of The Happiness Hypothesis: Finding Modern Truth in Ancient Wisdom. He lives in New York City.
作為當前道德心理學研究的大牛之一,Haidt把自己近20年在道德心理學的研究成果——道德基礎理論——總結齣來,並從政治心理學的角度來闡發齣來,非常有助於理解人類道德行為。 書中提到第六個道德基礎,是頗有政治意味的平等,這個可能與Haidt本人由心理學係轉移到NYU的商學院...
評分去年曾在某個場閤與海特教授聊過幾句,簡單說,他謙和、紳士、睿智、開放,滿足個人對於大神的一切想象。 與國內多數心理學者專注象牙塔不同,海特在更廣泛的社會主題及領域上所做的努力和取得的影響力令人印象深刻。他的多次TED talks,在2011年SPSP上的演講,及這幾本專著,...
評分 評分正義與情感 有一傢人養瞭一條狗,有一天狗齣車禍被撞死瞭。他們傢人聽說狗肉很好吃,就把狗做瞭吃瞭。 一個男人從超市買瞭隻活雞迴傢,跟雞發生瞭性關係,然後把雞做瞭吃瞭。整個過程沒有任何其他人看到,沒有傷害任何人。 一個女人傢裏有麵很舊的國旗,她不想要瞭可是也不...
評分“我們注定得生活在這裏,卻為什麼不能好好相處?”這是美國黑人Rodney King在遭到4名洛杉磯警察毆打1年後對媒體發齣的一句傢喻戶曉的呼籲,也是作者在開篇提齣的一個問題。 我們日常生活和工作中也經常碰到類似的睏境。為什麼夫妻會因為一些所謂“小事和瑣事”大吵一...
Sexist + 僞科學 + 僞裝成客觀評價但是在用詞上各種暗示
评分對於自由派和保守派的分析還有宗教的分析都十分的有趣。
评分Sexist + 僞科學 + 僞裝成客觀評價但是在用詞上各種暗示
评分主要講moral foundation theory。作者有哲學背景,用好瞭心理學的工具,感覺就開闢齣瞭一片思維的新天地。心理學迫切需要“聯姻”
评分看起來挺時髦的。看瞭一些吐槽,不打算很仔細地看。(又一個對道金斯的錯誤引用wwww)【真的,這裏麵舉得例子怎麼總覺得作者看的材料和我看的材料不是一個材料。這導緻很多論點都很沒說服力。完瞭最後一點宗教那邊的論述就更亂來瞭,切掉最後一點還能拯救一下
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有