Annie Duke (born Anne LaBarr Lederer) is a professional poker player and author who won a bracelet in the 2004 World Series of Poker $2,000 Omaha Hi-Low Split-8 or Better Event and was the winner of the 2004 World Series of Poker Tournament of Champions, where she earned the Winner-Take-All prize of $2,000,000.
发表于2024-12-22
Thinking in Bets 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
一夜暴富需要的到底是运气还是别的什么? 本书的书名是“对赌,信息不足时如何做出高明的决策”,这是一本教你如何提升决策水平的书。但除了决策之外,更为重要的是淡化输赢。 本书共分为六个个重点内容。 第一个重点是:不以成败论英雄。 第二个重点是:关注决策质量本身。 第...
评分 评分由于具有不确定性(运气因素),生活更像是扑克而不是象棋,因此学习对赌思维十分必要。 对赌思维就是认识到决策的质量和运气在影响着我们的生活,因此我们要去学习分辨两者。普通人以结果为导向(把结果等同于决策质量),而高手关注系统。以结果为导向就会导致瞎JB更改决策系...
评分作者是认知心理学博士,有一个职业扑克玩家哥哥,机缘巧合专职玩德州扑克20年。 作者在玩牌过程中意识到,扑克比赛中的决策次数特别多特别频繁,差不多每两分钟要有一次决策,可能一个决策就影响到一套房子的输赢。于是对优秀扑克选手的决策模式做了许多思考。 书中总结了优秀...
图书标签: 决策 思维 心理学 英文原版 不确定性 认知精进 扑克 成长
In Super Bowl XLIX, Seahawks coach Pete Carroll made one of the most controversial calls in football history: With 26 seconds remaining, and trailing by four at the Patriots' one-yard line, he called for a pass instead of a hand off to his star running back. The pass was intercepted and the Seahawks lost. Critics called it the dumbest play in history. But was the call really that bad? Or did Carroll actually make a great move that was ruined by bad luck?
Even the best decision doesn't yield the best outcome every time. There's always an element of luck that you can't control, and there is always information that is hidden from view. So the key to long-term success (and avoiding worrying yourself to death) is to think in bets: How sure am I? What are the possible ways things could turn out? What decision has the highest odds of success? Did I land in the unlucky 10% on the strategy that works 90% of the time? Or is my success attributable to dumb luck rather than great decision making?
Annie Duke, a former World Series of Poker champion turned business consultant, draws on examples from business, sports, politics, and (of course) poker to share tools anyone can use to embrace uncertainty and make better decisions. For most people, it's difficult to say "I'm not sure" in a world that values and, even, rewards the appearance of certainty. But professional poker players are comfortable with the fact that great decisions don't always lead to great outcomes and bad decisions don't always lead to bad outcomes.
By shifting your thinking from a need for certainty to a goal of accurately assessing what you know and what you don't, you'll be less vulnerable to reactive emotions, knee-jerk biases, and destructive habits in your decision making. You'll become more confident, calm, compassionate and successful in the long run.
道理咱都懂,但鸽子还是很大… 其实不少论点在其他地方都见过,尤其很多都在《思考,快与慢》中提及过。个人觉得可能比较独特有趣的两点:1. 简单地问一句“打个赌?”往往就能迫使自己更理性地分析各种可能性,帮助形成更全面的观点。2. 许多不利于探寻真理的思维定式,如自以为是、怨天尤人、幸灾乐祸,因为它们都会让自我感觉相对更良好,所以都难以改正;因此需要对应地在大脑中为相反想法建立正向反馈,比如夸奖自己“这种情况下我能不怨天尤人真难得”之类的,才能让有益的思维模式形成习惯。
评分思想资源上溯到密尔的《论自由》,也综合了近年来行为经济学的研究成果。因为不确定,因为能力和运气交织影响结果,所以得用打牌下赌注的概率思维来考虑如何决策。既要从积极的结果倒推需要采取的步骤,也要预见到光明前途中的困难,做好应对准备。感觉跟中国谚语中的一些人生智慧不谋而合。
评分觉得很有意思,作者经历也是传奇。
评分这不是一本教你怎么打扑克 的书。近年以来,杜克从职业 扑克圈淡出,转型给 CEO 之 类的大人物做演讲和培训,她 教的是科学决策。这也是这本书的内容。
评分作者主要的观点就是:不要对过去做出的选择有所遗憾,因为糟糕的结果,需要不断地前行。里面用到了很多Thinking Fast and Slow里的心理概念。
Thinking in Bets 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书