1998年諾貝爾經濟學奬獲得者
Is justice an ideal, forever beyond our grasp, or something that may actually guide our practical decisions and enhance our lives?In this wide-ranging book, Amartya Sen presents an alternative approach to mainstream theories of justice which, despite their many specific achievements have taken us, he argues, in the wrong direction in general. At the heart of Sen’s argument is his insistence on the role of public reason in establishing what can make societies less unjust. But it is in the nature of reasoning about justice, argues Sen, that it does not allow all questions to be settled even in theory; there are choices to be faced between alternative assessments of what is reasonable; several different and competing positions can each be well-defended.Far from rejecting such pluralities or trying to reduce them beyond the limits of reasoning, we should make use of them to construct a theory of justice that can absorb divergent points of view. Sen also shows how concern about the principles of justice in the modern world must avoid parochialism, and further, address questions of global injustice. The breadth of vision, intellectual acuity and striking humanity of one of the world's leading public intellectuals have never been more clearly shown than in this remarkable book.
發表於2025-02-02
The Idea of Justice 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
學者思考的正義《正義的理念》 厚厚的一大本,讓你感覺到厚重,這就是學者的作品,一個我們生活中耳熟能詳的再簡單不過的一個詞——“正義”竟然能夠寫齣來怎麼多內容。 看看介紹纔知道這可不是一個一般的學者,作者是阿馬蒂亞是印度人,是一九九八年的諾貝爾經濟學...
評分我看書總是愛先打量一下書本的厚度,往往是越厚越喜歡。這本書就挺厚的,足有三百九十一頁,三十七萬字,二十七點五個印張,份量真的很足。看著這麼厚實的一本,我真是打心眼裏喜歡。喜歡就開始讀唄,不過這一讀,問題就齣來瞭。 當然瞭,這不是作者的問題,也不是譯者的問題,...
評分[按語:讀這本書的情緒是從開始的驚喜到後來的失望。Sen在捲1中站在經驗比較路徑的立場對Rawls的先驗製度主義的批評可謂切中要害(justice as fairness的唯一性是難以容忍的,雖然後期Rawls也做瞭讓步),隨後引介斯密的impartial spectator也算看點;但其“理性的客觀性在於公...
評分我看書總是愛先打量一下書本的厚度,往往是越厚越喜歡。這本書就挺厚的,足有三百九十一頁,三十七萬字,二十七點五個印張,份量真的很足。看著這麼厚實的一本,我真是打心眼裏喜歡。喜歡就開始讀唄,不過這一讀,問題就齣來瞭。 當然瞭,這不是作者的問題,也不是譯者的問題,...
圖書標籤: 哲學 政治哲學 AmatyaSen Justice 社會學 philosophy 阿馬蒂亞森 經科
justice should be considered with respect to what actually happens in real world as opposed to metaphysics arguments and idealized concepts
評分Love the introduction. I probably like Nussbaum more than Sen, but they have different perspectives based on their other identities.
評分吐個槽,當然很可能是我還沒看懂:鑽牛角尖鑽齣一本書,嚼一句話嚼齣一本書。大段大段的論述不如一個數學定理來得痛快。Sen不能用數學恐怕自己也很痛苦吧。
評分今天你自由瞭麼? 還是比較textbooky的一本書,不過作為poli sci入門書,應該是不錯念
評分清晰,有新的東西。
The Idea of Justice 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載