Clifford Geertz (1926-2006) was a cultural anthopologist. At the time of his death he was professor emeritus at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton. He was professor of anthropology at the University of Chicago from 1960 to 1970. He carried out fieldwork in Indonesia and North Africa, which forms the basis of his books published by the University of Chiocago Press.
"In four brief chapters," writes Clifford Geertz in his preface, "I have attempted both to lay out a general framework for the comparative analysis of religion and to apply it to a study of the development of a supposedly single creed, Islam, in two quite contrasting civilizations, the Indonesian and the Moroccan."
Mr. Geertz begins his argument by outlining the problem conceptually and providing an overview of the two countries. He then traces the evolution of their classical religious styles which, with disparate settings and unique histories, produced strikingly different spiritual climates. So in Morocco, the Islamic conception of life came to mean activism, moralism, and intense individuality, while in Indonesia the same concept emphasized aestheticism, inwardness, and the radical dissolution of personality. In order to assess the significance of these interesting developments, Mr. Geertz sets forth a series of theoretical observations concerning the social role of religion.
發表於2024-11-07
Islam Observed 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 人類學 伊斯蘭教 格爾茨 宗教人類學 宗教 文化研究 伊斯蘭人類學 SEAsia
研究宗教變遷是研究想象的社會史,一句話點破他們的錯誤。最後一章值得細讀,如何比較它和《作為文化體係的宗教》及Asad等的批評?
評分雙關// the antipodes of the Muslim world:有著韆年印度教傳統,後又成為穆斯林社會的巴厘,與從一開始就是穆斯林社會的摩洛哥之間存在怎樣異同。同是重視mysticism-神秘主義傾嚮,在兩個不同的社會中又是以怎樣不同的“classic styles”錶現齣來的。
評分研究宗教變遷是研究想象的社會史,一句話點破他們的錯誤。最後一章值得細讀,如何比較它和《作為文化體係的宗教》及Asad等的批評?
評分研究宗教變遷是研究想象的社會史,一句話點破他們的錯誤。最後一章值得細讀,如何比較它和《作為文化體係的宗教》及Asad等的批評?
評分研究宗教變遷是研究想象的社會史,一句話點破他們的錯誤。最後一章值得細讀,如何比較它和《作為文化體係的宗教》及Asad等的批評?
Islam Observed 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載