Pamela Kyle Crossley is Professor of History at Dartmouth College. Helen Siu is Professor of Anthropology at Yale University. Donald Sutton is Professor of History and Anthropology at Carnegie Mellon University.
发表于2024-12-22
Empire at the Margins 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
Regarding the issue of frontier and ethnicity, the volume edited by Crossley et al. makes significant contributions. Probably out of the hand of Crossley, the introduction to this volume maintains the ambiguity of that in The Translucent Mirror. Apart from ...
评分Regarding the issue of frontier and ethnicity, the volume edited by Crossley et al. makes significant contributions. Probably out of the hand of Crossley, the introduction to this volume maintains the ambiguity of that in The Translucent Mirror. Apart from ...
评分Regarding the issue of frontier and ethnicity, the volume edited by Crossley et al. makes significant contributions. Probably out of the hand of Crossley, the introduction to this volume maintains the ambiguity of that in The Translucent Mirror. Apart from ...
评分Regarding the issue of frontier and ethnicity, the volume edited by Crossley et al. makes significant contributions. Probably out of the hand of Crossley, the introduction to this volume maintains the ambiguity of that in The Translucent Mirror. Apart from ...
评分Regarding the issue of frontier and ethnicity, the volume edited by Crossley et al. makes significant contributions. Probably out of the hand of Crossley, the introduction to this volume maintains the ambiguity of that in The Translucent Mirror. Apart from ...
图书标签: 海外中国研究 历史 边疆史 萧凤霞 新清史 清史 柯娇燕 美国汉学
Focusing on the Ming (1368-1644) and (especially) the Qing (1364-1912) eras, this book analyzes crucial moments in the formation of cultural, regional, and religious identities. The contributors examine the role of the state in a variety of environments on China's "peripheries," paying attention to shifts in law, trade, social stratification, and cultural dialogue. They find that local communities were critical participants in the shaping of their own identities and consciousness as well as the character and behavior of the state. At certain times the state was institutionally definitive, but it could also be symbolic and contingent. They demonstrate how the imperial discourse is many-faceted, rather than a monolithic agent of cultural assimilation.
读了米华健那章
评分新清史快速纵览
评分Five stars for providing me with relatively objective views on groups known as Zhuang,Miao and Yao today !
评分新清史快速纵览
评分本书核心问题似是由primordialism/constructivism之争引出,然后将这个问题延伸到清史领域,用欧立德的话说,如果民族认同是一种文化构建,那么这个构建并不一定只能建立在现代工业的基础上,这个政治过程在帝国体系里是怎么进行的?本书多强调国家自上而下的民族划分/构建。八旗作为身份认同的制度载体,使得满汉即使在本身性质已经和清初完全不同之后仍然保留着特殊的认同;蒙古的身份构建则强调清/东蒙与西蒙之间的冲突过程,以及黄金家族作为构建核心的象征地位;清廷对汉回的模糊态度关系到其身份的语义混乱;西疆则不同,是“有中国特色的帝国主义”,indirect rule在此体现最为明显,因此在20世纪前突厥并没有统一的民族认同。当然前工业时代民族认同是精英阶层的,但作为现代民族的基础未尝不可?
Empire at the Margins 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书