Pamela Kyle Crossley is Professor of History at Dartmouth College. Helen Siu is Professor of Anthropology at Yale University. Donald Sutton is Professor of History and Anthropology at Carnegie Mellon University.
Focusing on the Ming (1368-1644) and (especially) the Qing (1364-1912) eras, this book analyzes crucial moments in the formation of cultural, regional, and religious identities. The contributors examine the role of the state in a variety of environments on China's "peripheries," paying attention to shifts in law, trade, social stratification, and cultural dialogue. They find that local communities were critical participants in the shaping of their own identities and consciousness as well as the character and behavior of the state. At certain times the state was institutionally definitive, but it could also be symbolic and contingent. They demonstrate how the imperial discourse is many-faceted, rather than a monolithic agent of cultural assimilation.
發表於2024-11-22
Empire at the Margins 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
Regarding the issue of frontier and ethnicity, the volume edited by Crossley et al. makes significant contributions. Probably out of the hand of Crossley, the introduction to this volume maintains the ambiguity of that in The Translucent Mirror. Apart from ...
評分Regarding the issue of frontier and ethnicity, the volume edited by Crossley et al. makes significant contributions. Probably out of the hand of Crossley, the introduction to this volume maintains the ambiguity of that in The Translucent Mirror. Apart from ...
評分Regarding the issue of frontier and ethnicity, the volume edited by Crossley et al. makes significant contributions. Probably out of the hand of Crossley, the introduction to this volume maintains the ambiguity of that in The Translucent Mirror. Apart from ...
評分Regarding the issue of frontier and ethnicity, the volume edited by Crossley et al. makes significant contributions. Probably out of the hand of Crossley, the introduction to this volume maintains the ambiguity of that in The Translucent Mirror. Apart from ...
評分Regarding the issue of frontier and ethnicity, the volume edited by Crossley et al. makes significant contributions. Probably out of the hand of Crossley, the introduction to this volume maintains the ambiguity of that in The Translucent Mirror. Apart from ...
圖書標籤: 海外中國研究 曆史 邊疆史 蕭鳳霞 新清史 清史 柯嬌燕 美國漢學
本書核心問題似是由primordialism/constructivism之爭引齣,然後將這個問題延伸到清史領域,用歐立德的話說,如果民族認同是一種文化構建,那麼這個構建並不一定隻能建立在現代工業的基礎上,這個政治過程在帝國體係裏是怎麼進行的?本書多強調國傢自上而下的民族劃分/構建。八旗作為身份認同的製度載體,使得滿漢即使在本身性質已經和清初完全不同之後仍然保留著特殊的認同;濛古的身份構建則強調清/東濛與西濛之間的衝突過程,以及黃金傢族作為構建核心的象徵地位;清廷對漢迴的模糊態度關係到其身份的語義混亂;西疆則不同,是“有中國特色的帝國主義”,indirect rule在此體現最為明顯,因此在20世紀前突厥並沒有統一的民族認同。當然前工業時代民族認同是精英階層的,但作為現代民族的基礎未嘗不可?
評分一切國傢建構史都可以成為徵服史,自古以來是一傢的花可能都是野花!
評分一切國傢建構史都可以成為徵服史,自古以來是一傢的花可能都是野花!
評分讀瞭米華健那章
評分本書核心問題似是由primordialism/constructivism之爭引齣,然後將這個問題延伸到清史領域,用歐立德的話說,如果民族認同是一種文化構建,那麼這個構建並不一定隻能建立在現代工業的基礎上,這個政治過程在帝國體係裏是怎麼進行的?本書多強調國傢自上而下的民族劃分/構建。八旗作為身份認同的製度載體,使得滿漢即使在本身性質已經和清初完全不同之後仍然保留著特殊的認同;濛古的身份構建則強調清/東濛與西濛之間的衝突過程,以及黃金傢族作為構建核心的象徵地位;清廷對漢迴的模糊態度關係到其身份的語義混亂;西疆則不同,是“有中國特色的帝國主義”,indirect rule在此體現最為明顯,因此在20世紀前突厥並沒有統一的民族認同。當然前工業時代民族認同是精英階層的,但作為現代民族的基礎未嘗不可?
Empire at the Margins 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載