In his first essay, "Languages and Their Implications," J. G. A. Pocock announces the emergence of the history of political thought as a discipline apart from political philosophy. Traditionally, "history" of political thought has meant a chronological ordering of intellectual systems without attention to political languages; but it is through the study of those languages and of their changes, Pocock claims, that political thought will at last be studied historically.
Pocock argues that the solution has already been approached by, first, the linguistic philosophers, with their emphasis on the importance of language study to understanding human thought, and, second, by Thomas Kuhn's "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions," with its notion of controlling intellectual paradigms. Those paradigms within and through which the scientist organizes his intellectual enterprise may well be seen as analogous to the worlds of political discourse in which political problems are posed and political solutions are proffered. Using this notion of successive paradigms, Pocock demonstrates its effectiveness by analyzing a wide range of subjects, from ancient Chinese philosophy to Machiavelli, Hobbes, and Burke.
發表於2024-12-22
Politics, Language, and Time 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 思想史 J.G.A.Pocock 劍橋學派 政治哲學 霍布斯 英文原版 波考剋 西方政治思想
keep in mind you may fall asleep several times before you are eventually steered into his point. He's not good at grasping the point clearly and may be due to his own "context" he, for me, seems have chosen the wrong person and ideas to develop conversati
評分keep in mind you may fall asleep several times before you are eventually steered into his point. He's not good at grasping the point clearly and may be due to his own "context" he, for me, seems have chosen the wrong person and ideas to develop conversati
評分把約阿西姆的曆史化trinity置入近代早期的語境尤其精彩,這樣就使得中世紀到近代早期的政治神學演變更加立體化瞭,同時也足以道齣16、17世紀的政治思想區彆於後來的啓濛主義之處;行文可見Pocock之功力深厚(私以為勝過其他任何劍橋派),缺點是常有贅述令人offline.
評分把約阿西姆的曆史化trinity置入近代早期的語境尤其精彩,這樣就使得中世紀到近代早期的政治神學演變更加立體化瞭,同時也足以道齣16、17世紀的政治思想區彆於後來的啓濛主義之處;行文可見Pocock之功力深厚(私以為勝過其他任何劍橋派),缺點是常有贅述令人offline.
評分把約阿西姆的曆史化trinity置入近代早期的語境尤其精彩,這樣就使得中世紀到近代早期的政治神學演變更加立體化瞭,同時也足以道齣16、17世紀的政治思想區彆於後來的啓濛主義之處;行文可見Pocock之功力深厚(私以為勝過其他任何劍橋派),缺點是常有贅述令人offline.
Politics, Language, and Time 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載