Edward J. M. Rhoads is professor of history at the University of Texas at Austin. He is the author of China's Republican Revolution: The Case of Kwangtung, 1895-1913.Winner of the Joseph Levenson Book Prize for Modern China, sponsored by The China and Inner Asia Council of the Association for Asian Studies
发表于2024-11-21
Manchus and Han 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
摘要:透过族群关系,路康乐提出了一系列问题:谁是满,谁是汉?义和团运动后革命党人是怎样批评满人的?在满人统治中国两百多年后,满汉到底有多大的区别?清政府是怎样处理这些批评的?满汉畛域是否有所弥合?关于汉满关系,清廷到底是有所作为或是无所作为而导致精英与之分...
评分摘要:路康乐著《满与汉》面世以来,广受好评。作者以“满”“汉”对立的视角得到了学界的甚高评价,但他忽视对概念的界定,遗漏满汉之外的其他族群和将满汉完全对立致有失真。该书的研究内容与所选研究时段明显分离,透露出模糊性而不便读者理解。自盖博坚并不确定地称该书为...
评分10月24日,随着西安的满城被攻陷,革命党人对满城内进行了顽强抵抗的满人军队进行了屠杀,其中也包括了很多无辜的妇女和儿童。 在个别的其他地方,也发生过类似的情况,有妇女跪下来哀求道:“我们也觉得“扬州十日”是罪过,但和我们有什么关系呢,你们杀了我们又能怎么...
评分 评分图书标签: 历史 新清史 海外中国研究 满族 中国近代史 路康乐 民族主义 民族-国家
China's 1911-12 Revolution, which overthrew a 2000-year succession of dynasties, is thought of primarily as a change in governmental style, from imperial to republican, traditional to modern. But given that the dynasty that was overthrown—the Qing—was that of a minority ethnic group that had ruled China's Han majority for nearly three centuries, and that the revolutionaries were overwhelmingly Han, to what extent was the revolution not only anti-monarchical, but also anti-Manchu?
Edward Rhoads explores this provocative and complicated question in Manchus and Han, analyzing the evolution of the Manchus from a hereditary military caste (the "banner people") to a distinct ethnic group and then detailing the interplay and dialogue between the Manchu court and Han reformers that culminated in the dramatic changes of the early 20th century.
Until now, many scholars have assumed that the Manchus had been assimilated into Han culture long before the 1911 Revolution and were no longer separate and distinguishable. But Rhoads demonstrates that in many ways Manchus remained an alien, privileged, and distinct group. Manchus and Han is a pathbreaking study that will forever change the way historians of China view the events leading to the fall of the Qing dynasty. Likewise, it will clarify for ethnologists the unique origin of the Manchus as an occupational caste and their shifting relationship with the Han, from border people to rulers to ruled.
考试临近,加上书过期了,只好囫囵吞枣地速读了前两章,幸好买了中文版,等考完了再看。
评分相当描述性的叙述方式,没有明确点出argument所以读起来有点累。讲了满族从一个军事职业群体向一个现代族群(在文化建构意义上)转变的过程。因为主要着眼于统治者的分类标准而非民间社会的认知和满人自身的身份认同,所以个人对这个thesis尚有疑问。结尾有两点很有趣:a)国民党将中国看作以“中华民族”为基础的民族国家,而这个“中华民族”的概念实际上与汉族无异,因为其他各族都被视为(应当)被汉族同化的群体;而ccp的意识形态则主张真正的“多民族国家”概念,事实上相对来说更加的文化多元主义;b.从五族到56个民族,为什么一些“少数民族”被进一步地细分(例如回族和旗人),而汉族始终是一个异质然而庞大的群体?(大概因为汉人是制定这个分类的主体吧,而分类的过程就是一个权力的场)
评分相当棒,特别厉害,真的很喜欢
评分作者中文功底还是很深厚的,史料也很到位,关于此书看过的最好评论是狄宇宙写的。对照汉译本,就某章的个别“foreigners”被翻译成“列强”这一点,我再也不敢相信汉译的海外汉学了……
评分感觉是为了反驳Mary Wright而专门写了本书一样,这一定是真爱。以及那么多次引用老舍真的大丈夫吗……
Manchus and Han 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书