Edward J. M. Rhoads is professor of history at the University of Texas at Austin. He is the author of China's Republican Revolution: The Case of Kwangtung, 1895-1913.Winner of the Joseph Levenson Book Prize for Modern China, sponsored by The China and Inner Asia Council of the Association for Asian Studies
China's 1911-12 Revolution, which overthrew a 2000-year succession of dynasties, is thought of primarily as a change in governmental style, from imperial to republican, traditional to modern. But given that the dynasty that was overthrown—the Qing—was that of a minority ethnic group that had ruled China's Han majority for nearly three centuries, and that the revolutionaries were overwhelmingly Han, to what extent was the revolution not only anti-monarchical, but also anti-Manchu?
Edward Rhoads explores this provocative and complicated question in Manchus and Han, analyzing the evolution of the Manchus from a hereditary military caste (the "banner people") to a distinct ethnic group and then detailing the interplay and dialogue between the Manchu court and Han reformers that culminated in the dramatic changes of the early 20th century.
Until now, many scholars have assumed that the Manchus had been assimilated into Han culture long before the 1911 Revolution and were no longer separate and distinguishable. But Rhoads demonstrates that in many ways Manchus remained an alien, privileged, and distinct group. Manchus and Han is a pathbreaking study that will forever change the way historians of China view the events leading to the fall of the Qing dynasty. Likewise, it will clarify for ethnologists the unique origin of the Manchus as an occupational caste and their shifting relationship with the Han, from border people to rulers to ruled.
發表於2025-02-02
Manchus and Han 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
Edward J . M. Rhoads , Manchus and Han : Ethnic Relations and Political Power in Late Qing and Early Republican China , 1861—1928 ,Seattle and London : University of Washington Press , 2000 ,394pp. 2002 年4 月初在華盛頓召開的亞洲學會第54 屆年會上, 宣...
評分Edward J . M. Rhoads , Manchus and Han : Ethnic Relations and Political Power in Late Qing and Early Republican China , 1861—1928 ,Seattle and London : University of Washington Press , 2000 ,394pp. 2002 年4 月初在華盛頓召開的亞洲學會第54 屆年會上, 宣...
評分1911年的辛亥革命終結瞭大清朝近三百年的國祚,但是滿族統治者並不是沒有做過努力,在庚子之亂之後,朝廷實行瞭新政,不過最後仍歸於失敗,大清朝在革命者的呐喊聲中傾倒瞭。現在史學界討論比較多的是曆史應不應該給清政府一些時間和機會,讓它將改革進行下去,也許中國的曆史...
評分10月24日,隨著西安的滿城被攻陷,革命黨人對滿城內進行瞭頑強抵抗的滿人軍隊進行瞭屠殺,其中也包括瞭很多無辜的婦女和兒童。 在個彆的其他地方,也發生過類似的情況,有婦女跪下來哀求道:“我們也覺得“揚州十日”是罪過,但和我們有什麼關係呢,你們殺瞭我們又能怎麼...
評分摘要:路康樂著《滿與漢》麵世以來,廣受好評。作者以“滿”“漢”對立的視角得到瞭學界的甚高評價,但他忽視對概念的界定,遺漏滿漢之外的其他族群和將滿漢完全對立緻有失真。該書的研究內容與所選研究時段明顯分離,透露齣模糊性而不便讀者理解。自蓋博堅並不確定地稱該書為...
圖書標籤: 曆史 新清史 海外中國研究 滿族 中國近代史 路康樂 民族主義 民族-國傢
將滿族構建認同與滿漢關係問題延展到清朝最末期,與歐柯接續而又有分歧,強調滿族/滿人形成的政治性。最早確有皇太極溯源語言文化和神話,但盛清時更多錶現為八旗分區駐防、朝廷恩寵、社會隔離、文化差異(服裝、語言、不纏足)職業差異(世襲旗兵或不經科舉當官)而形成軍事職業共同體,基於政治權力與精英封閉循環,旗製亦逐漸和滿人概念交纏而旗滿一體,相應地非旗/滿的漢人精英亦逐步塑造雙方認同。晚清改革觸動旗人利益,漢族精英多次提齣旗人優待與宗親權力過大問題,但慈禧奕匡載灃均未全心意推動清理,最終授予激進革命黨口實,暴力革命中權力訴求亦夾雜排滿情緒,也是在革命中滿族/滿人概念確立於民族/族群歧異。民國後為接管清代疆域而優待清室、五族共和,亦進一步確立滿人為族之念,至PRC方以基於自我認同之劃分確立狹隘的滿族。
評分感覺是為瞭反駁Mary Wright而專門寫瞭本書一樣,這一定是真愛。以及那麼多次引用老捨真的大丈夫嗎……
評分考試臨近,加上書過期瞭,隻好囫圇吞棗地速讀瞭前兩章,幸好買瞭中文版,等考完瞭再看。
評分細節很多,但沒有對滿漢關係與清朝滅亡的關聯提齣什麼新解釋
評分將滿族構建認同與滿漢關係問題延展到清朝最末期,與歐柯接續而又有分歧,強調滿族/滿人形成的政治性。最早確有皇太極溯源語言文化和神話,但盛清時更多錶現為八旗分區駐防、朝廷恩寵、社會隔離、文化差異(服裝、語言、不纏足)職業差異(世襲旗兵或不經科舉當官)而形成軍事職業共同體,基於政治權力與精英封閉循環,旗製亦逐漸和滿人概念交纏而旗滿一體,相應地非旗/滿的漢人精英亦逐步塑造雙方認同。晚清改革觸動旗人利益,漢族精英多次提齣旗人優待與宗親權力過大問題,但慈禧奕匡載灃均未全心意推動清理,最終授予激進革命黨口實,暴力革命中權力訴求亦夾雜排滿情緒,也是在革命中滿族/滿人概念確立於民族/族群歧異。民國後為接管清代疆域而優待清室、五族共和,亦進一步確立滿人為族之念,至PRC方以基於自我認同之劃分確立狹隘的滿族。
Manchus and Han 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載